Legal Opinion

Hohman v. Royce M.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 8, 1994No. 91 CV 120; CA A77153PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendants move for reconsideration of our opinion reversing the trial court’s denial of plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief prohibiting defendants from building a house on defendants’ lot. 125 Or App 306, 865 P2d 1301 (1993). In our initial opinion, we applied a de novo standard of review as to all issues. Defendants argue that that was error as to their affirmative defense of waiver. We allow reconsideration and modify our opinion, but adhere to it.

In our opinion, we held that defendants did not demonstrate that plaintiffs had waived their right to enforce the restriction on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Illingworth v. BushongOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Coos County v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. McMillan v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Marshall v. BurchamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Guardian Management, LLC Ex Rel. St. Vincent DePaul Villa v. ZamielloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Duncan v. Office DepotDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1997
  4. State v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. BennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API