Legal Opinion

State v. Becker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 9, 2002No. 99CR0428; A110387PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant appeals from his judgment of conviction for escape in the second degree. ORS 162.155. Defendant’s sole contention is that the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the state failed to comply with ORS 135.7601 and ORS 135.7632 by not bringing him to trial within 90 days after the district attorney received his request for a speedy trial. In particular, defendant challenges the trial court’s conclusion that, having invoked his statutory right to a trial within 90 days, defendant waived that right by remaining silent when his attorney…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. HunterOregon Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gutale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. FordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. BennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API