Marshall v. Burcham
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
Defendants (buyers) appeal the foreclosure of a land sale contract. We affirm.
The facts are not contested. Plaintiff (seller) owned two homes on adjoining parcels of land, 20 and 10 acres in size, which were legally recognized as separate parcels. She redivided the two parcels to create parcels of 16 and 14 acres. In November, 1988, buyers and seller entered into a contract for the sale of the 16-acre parcel, which included a dilapidated house. The contract required buyers to make monthly payments of $500, to maintain fire insurance and to pay the property taxes. Seller sought judicial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Illingworth v. BushongOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Hagen v. O'Connell, Goyak & BallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hohman v. Royce M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Sheldon v. SheldonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- T. M. Pete Enterprises, Inc. v. PlaiaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994