Legal Opinion

Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1994No. 93-CO-725PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Associate Judge:

Appellant, Indiana Lumbermen’s Mutual Insurance Company (“Indiana Lumbermen”), appeals from the trial court’s order denying without a hearing its motion to set aside a bond forfeiture pursuant to Super.Ct.Crim.R. 116(h)(2). Indiana Lumbermen contends that the trial court abused its discretion in (1) denying its motion to set aside the bond forfeiture on the basis of impossibility of performance and (2) failing to conduct a hearing to ascertain whether the forfeiture should have been set aside. We affirm.

I

Kenneth Rogers (“Rogers”), a/k/a Barry Winston Amos, was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

United States v. Joseph J. Nell and Leonard Weinstein, SuretyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
State v. AmadorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
State v. CummingsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
American Bankers Insurance Co. v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

State v. DiPietroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009