Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1984No. 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillin, P.J.

The appellee has filed no brief and we therefore proceed under App. R. 18(C) which provides in part:

“* * * If an appellee fails to file his brief * * * in determining the appeal, the court may accept the appellant’s statement of the facts and issues as correct and reverse the judgment if appellant’s brief reasonably appears to sustain such action.”

After being charged with aggravated burglary and grand theft, Gregory Smith was released on bail. Appellant, Clyde W. White, was surety on the bail bond.

When Smith did not appear in court as directed, the court forfeited his bail and eventually…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Youngstown v. DurrettOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API