Legal Opinion

State v. Cummings

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1987No. 14673PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was found guilty following jury trial of receiving stolen property. He filed a motion for new trial. A hearing on that motion and sentencing was set for March 15, 1985. When defendant failed to appear his $2,500 bond was ordered forfeited.

The state then moved for a final judgment of default and execution under Rule 33.14. The bail bond agent appeared and sought to have the forfeiture set aside under § 374.770.1, RSMo Supp.1984, because the defendant was incarcerated in the Leavenworth, Kansas Federal Prison. That statutory section is set out below. *

At the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Poling v. MoitraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. State v. AdkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Benham v. CoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. State v. TennysonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GoodrichMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Smith v. ChristopherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. SiemensMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. YountMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. HeadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API