Legal Opinion

Madison Square Garden Corporation v. Braddock

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 10, 1937No. 6476PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

Upon April 10, 1935, Madison Square Garden Corporation (hereafter referred to *925as the Garden) entered into a contract with James J. Braddock which provided for a contest with Max Baer, then holder of the title of heavyweight champion of the world, and further provided in paragraph 10 of the contract as follows:

“That in the event Braddock is the winner of the boxing contest between him and the said Max Baer and Braddock shall become the heavyweight champion of the world, then the Garden shall employ Braddock and Braddock agrees that he will render services as a boxer in his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. LajoieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Lare v. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
  4. Keith v. KellermannU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
  5. Miller v. Morley Finishing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1898

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Doug Brady, Inc. v. New Jersey Building Laborers Statewide FundsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  2. John J. & Warren H. Graham v. Triangle Publications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Instant Delivery Corp. v. City Stores Co.(Lit Bros. Div.)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Nassau Sports v. PetersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  5. Williams v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1950

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API