Legal Opinion
Instant Delivery Corp. v. City Stores Co.(Lit Bros. Div.)
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 6, 1968No. Civ. A. 68-262PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
LUONGO, District Judge.
For the past several months Instant Delivery Corp., plaintiff herein, has been performing a package delivery service for two of the four major local department stores. Recently the four stores decided to re-establish consolidated delivery. Instant and the carrier which served the other two stores competed with each other to be selected for the consolidated delivery. Instant lost out. It instituted this suit for damages against the four stores and the successful carrier, charging violations of the antitrust laws. The matter is before…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Interphoto Corporation v. Minolta CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Joseph E. Seagram and Sons, Inc., and the House of Seagram, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd., McKesson and Robbins, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd., Barton Distilling Company v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.