Sun-Maid Raisin Growers of California v. Avis
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a nonprofit, co-operative agricultural association, organized under the laws of the state of California, brought this suit against defendants to enjoin them from threatening plaintiff and its customers with suit for infringement by reason of the manufacture and sale of plaintiff’s raisin syrup. Defendants Avis, Ameer, Younan, and Baboo áre owners of patent 1,381,613, granted June 14, 1921, for grape syrup. Service was procured upon only one of them, Ameer; the' others being nonresidents of this district. There is no evidence against defendant, Bar-tel, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mississippi & Missouri Railroad v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Glenwood Light & Water Co. v. Mutual Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- A. B. Farquhar Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1900
- Racine Paper Goods Co. v. DittgenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Frederick H. Hope v. Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc., the Hearst Corporation and Igor CassiniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. SeigniousDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1939
- Monoflo International, Inc. v. SahmDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- United States v. Hector UriarteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Flynn & Emrich Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.