Legal Opinion
Flynn & Emrich Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 12, 1931No. 3142PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition to review the action of the Federal Trade Commission in issuing an order that the petitioner cease and desist from threatening any person, firm, or corporation with suits in connection with patents claimed by petitioner covering a certain eoalfpeding mechanism, known as the “Huber Semi-Mechanical Stoker,” manufactured by petitioner.
The pertinent part of the order of the Commission reads as follows: “It is now ordered that the respondent, Flynn & Emrich Company, its officers, agents, representatives and employees, in connection with the sale of its…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Federal Trade Commission v. Pacific States Paper Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- A. B. Farquhar Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States Galvanizing & Plating Equipment Corp. v. Hanson-Van Winkle-Munning Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Forstmann Woolen Co. v. Murray Sices Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Federal Trade Commission v. A. McLean & SonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- American Ball Co. v. Federal Cartridge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Paint Products Co. v. Minwax Co., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.