Legal Opinion
Fifth Third Bank v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 12, 2002No. 95-503CPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration of the April 12, 2002 Ruling. Defendant charges that the court erred in finding that defendant had abandoned the issue of authority and in concluding that the issue had been resolved by binding precedent. Argument is deemed unnecessary.
United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839, 116 S.Ct. 2432, 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996), is the predicate for this case, the facts of which are set forth in Fifth Third Bank of W. Ohio v. United States, 52 Fed.Cl. 264 (2002).
The court welcomes motions for reconsideration or clarification…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- City of El Centro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- H. Landau & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fifth Third Bank of Western Ohio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Fifth Third Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Fifth Third Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.