Legal Opinion

Century Properties, LLC v. City of Corvallis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 19, 2006No. 2005-004, 2005-005, 2005-006, 2005-007, 2005-008, 2005-009, 2005-010, 2005-011, 2005-012, 2005-013, 2005-014, 2005-015, 2005-016, 2005-017; A132090PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a final opinion and order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), which concluded that petitioner lacked statutory standing to appeal certain ordinances that the City of Corvallis (city) had adopted as part of its periodic review process. The city moves to dismiss the judicial review for want of constitutional standing. We deny the motion to dismiss and affirm.

The relevant facts are few and undisputed. The city began its periodic review of its comprehensive plan and land use amendments in 1996. In 2000, the Department of Land Conservation and Development…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Krieger v. JustOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Holcomb v. SunderlandOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. GlaspeyOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Nibler v. Oregon Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conte v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API