Legal Opinion

Lee v. First National Bank of Fort Scott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Bourbon District Court. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

Suit was brought by the First National Bank of Fort Scott against Golden and Lee on the following promissory note:

“Fort Scott, Kas., Oct. 7, 1887.
“Ninety days after date; we promise to pay to the order of the First National Bank of Fort Scott, Kansas, the sum of three hundred dollars, value received, payable at the First National Bank, Fort Scott, Kansas, with interest from maturity at the rate of twelve per cent, per annum. Interest payable quarterly, and if not paid when due, to bear the same rate of interest as the principal. The drawers and indorsers hereof severally…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Winship v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Livingston v. RooseveltNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  3. Deardorf's Administrator v. ThacherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Smith v. SloanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Horn v. Newton City BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wade v. HornadaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Schumacher v. the Sumner Tele. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. First National Bank of Browerville v. StaddenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Reid v. LinderMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Chastain v. BaxterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API