First National Bank of Browerville v. Stadden
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Mille Lacs county to recover $95.50 upon a bill of exchange. W. H. Ferrell was the only defendant who» answered. At the trial he objected to the introduction of evidence on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action against him, and the objection was sustained and the action dismissed. From an: order, Taylor, J., denying its motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action upon a bill of exchange, in which, on trial, an objection to the introduction of any evidence under the complaint on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action against defendant Ferrell was sustained, and the action dismissed. Plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial.
The only question presented is whether the complaint states a cause of action against defendant Ferrell. It alleges, in substance and effect, among other things, that plaintiff is a banking corporation doing business at Browerville, this state; that defendants were at all times stated therein…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Stevens v. McLachlanMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Lee v. First National Bank of Fort ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Vetsch v. NeissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Appletree Square I Ltd. Partnership v. Investmark, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Ringier America, Inc. v. Land O'lakes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- First National Bank v. WebsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Miller Publishing Co. v. OrthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Continental Supply Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.