Advanced Distribution System, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This ease is before the court on plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff argues that it was entitled to receive exclusive use charges for all shipments for which defendant requested such service, that defendant was not justified in eliminating such charges, and that summary judgment *600for plaintiff is therefore appropriate. Defendant contends, however, that summary judgment should be granted in its favor, arguing that plaintiff was, in effect, paid its exclusive use charges up to the amount allowed by the Military…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DGS Contract Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Aero Corp., S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Bullocks Express Transportation, Inc. v. XL Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2004