Legal Opinion
Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 30, 2004No. Nos. 99-400 C, 01-708 CPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court are Plaintiffs Claim for Bid and Proposal Costs (PL’s B & P Claim) and the responsive briefing thereto1 and Plaintiffs Motion to File Out of Time to Strike and/or Supplement Plaintiffs Position with Respect to Unsupported, Incorrect and Scandalous Allegations in Defendant’s March 2[4], 2004 Brief (Pl.’s Mot. to Strike) and the responsive briefing thereto.2 The court addresses plaintiffs motion to strike before turning to plaintiffs claim for bid preparation and proposal costs.
1. Plaintiffs Motion to Strike
Plaintiff moves the court to strike the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- E.W. Bliss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- McCallum Highlands, Ltd. v. Washington Capital Dus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Litton Industrial Products, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Solid State Systems Corp., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Severin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Chapman Law Firm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Raytheon Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Reema Consulting Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Geo-Seis Helicopters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Fisherman's Harvest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.