Legal Opinion

McCann v. Pennie

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1893No. 15241PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

Judgment was entered against the plaintiff upon demurrer to his complaint, and this appeal is from that judgment.

In May, 1882, Blythe claimed to be the owner and was in possession of a tract of land in Mexico containing about one million eight hundred thousand acres, and at that date entered into a contract with the plaintiff by which the plaintiff and his family should go from San Francisco to Mexico, and live upon the land, and conduct and manage the business of breeding, raising and *550selling hogs, cattle, horses and mules thereon from that time until December 31, 1887; and as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Janin v. BrowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Wise v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Field v. . FieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Ricketson v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. In Re the Estate of BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Fulmer v. Pacific Southwest Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Clayton v. DinwoodeyUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Neyland v. BrammerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API