Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Dinwoodey

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1908No. 1877PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; M. L. Bitchie, Judge. Action by W. Clayton against Henry M. Dinwoodey and other executors of a will. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSthahp, J.

On the 20th day of July, 1905, Henry Dinwoodey, in con-, sideration of the sum of $42,500, by warranty deed sold and conveyed to the plaintiff certain realty, free from all incum-brances, situate in Salt Lake City. By statute it is provided that every tax upon real property is a lien against the property assessed, which attaches as of the first Monday in Feb-urary of each year. On July 19, 21, 25, 28, and 31, 1905, the rates were fixed as provided by law, and the amount of taxes against the property ascertained to be $l,0f78.14. The taxes became delinquent November 15, 1905. Henry Din-woodey…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Moore v. SargentIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Falkner v. HendyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bonaparte v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  4. Floyd v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Moore v. McKinleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Branch v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Ward v. MagahaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Flynn v. DriscollIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Dern v. OlsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Smith v. HansonUtah Supreme Court · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API