Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Meiser
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 4, 2003No. 96,885PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, J.:
1 Plaintiffs, Steven M. and Ellen M. Rogers purchased a house from defendants, Charles A. and Barbara S. Meiser. After experiencing flooding problems they sued defendants for common law actual fraud and violation of the Residential Property Condition Disclosure Act (RPCDA), 60 O.8.Supp. 1995, § 831 et seq. (now O.S.2001). 1 Their petition sought rescission of the purchase contract, restoration of all monies paid by them, and actual and punitive/exemplary damages. The RPCDA allows recovery of actual damages for violation of its provisions (including the cost of repairing the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Greenberg v. WolfbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Schrock v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Specialty Beverages, L.L.C v. Pabst Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Bowman v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Estate of Hicks Ex Rel. Summers v. Urban East, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Combs v. Shelter Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.