Legal Opinion

Raven Red Ash Coal Co. v. Ball

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 11, 1946No. Record No. 3066PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.

*537Plaintiff, Estil Ball, stated, in his notice of motion, that he was entitled to recover $5,000 from the defendant for- the use and occupation of an easement across his land. Defendant denied any liability. The trial court entered judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $500 on the verdict returned by the jury. From that judgment, defendant obtained this writ of error.

There is no substantial conflict in the evidence. Plaintiff proved that he is the present owner of approximately 100 acres of land lying in Russell county which was a part of a 265-acre tract formerly owned by Reuben Sparks, and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Norfolk v. Norfolk CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  2. De Camp v. . BullardNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Clayborn v. Camilla Red Ash Coal Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  4. Tidewater Quarry Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  5. Watts v. C. I. Johnson & Bowman Real Estate Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Vines v. BranchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  2. Oenga v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Harrell v. F. H. Vahlsing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Hilderbrand v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Winborne v. DoyleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API