Legal Opinion

Jantzen Beach Associates v. Jantzen Dynamic Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 1, 2006No. 0011-12284; A118541Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Plaintiff petitions for reconsideration of our opinion reversing a judgment in its favor and dismissing its cross-appeal as moot. Jantzen Beach Associates v. Jantzen Dynamic Corp., 200 Or App 457, 115 P3d 943 (2005). Plaintiff contends, among other things, that we failed to address one of the assignments of error in its cross-appeal, which was a necessary precursor to our review of the merits in this action. We grant plaintiffs petition, and adhere to our original opinion as modified by this opinion. We write only to address (1) plaintiffs contention that we failed to first resolve one of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Raven Red Ash Coal Co. v. BallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  2. Willamette Quarries, Inc. v. WodtliOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Rogers v. DonovanOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Jantzen Beach Associates, LLC v. Jantzen Dynamic Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Jantzen Beach Associates v. JANTZEN DYNAMICCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API