Legal Opinion

United States v. Extreme Associates, Inc. Robert Zicari, AKA Rob Black Janet Romano, AKA Lizzie Borden

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 8, 2005No. 05-1555PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to decide whether the District Court erred by dismissing an indictment brought against Extreme Associates, Inc. and its proprietors under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1461 and 1465, which criminalize the commercial distribution of obscene materials, on the ground that those statutes violate the privacy rights of Extreme Associates’ customers under the Fifth Amendment doctrine of substantive due process. Because we conclude that the District Court improperly set aside applicable Supreme Court precedent which has repeatedly upheld federal statutes regulating…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Todd Tykarsky A/K/A Toddyty63 A/K/A Golpher12345Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. James E. MacEwanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  3. Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  4. Doctor John's, Inc. v. City of RoyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. CoilCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API