Legal Opinion
Doctor John's, Inc. v. City of Roy
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 10, 2006No. 04-4270PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Dr. John’s, Inc. (“Dr. John’s”) operates stores that sell, among other things, a range of “adult” products. After Dr. John’s located a store within its city limits, Defendant-Appellee Roy City (“Roy City” or “City”) passed an ordinance subjecting “sexually oriented businesses” to certain regulations. Dr. John’s challenged this ordinance on a variety of constitutional grounds; the district court rejected them all. We agree with the majority of the district court’s rulings, and thus AFFIRM in substantial part. However, one of the issues before the…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Bronson v. SwensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- New Mexico Ex Rel. Richardson v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Keepers, Inc. v. City of MilfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Taylor v. Roswell Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- VIP OF BERLIN, LLC v. Town of BerlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.