State v. Gesell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury for the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, tried in the district court for Pennington county before Grindeland, J., and a jury which returned a verdict of guilty. From an order'denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor. From an order denying his motion for a new trial defendant appealed. The indictment charges that defendant did on the eleventh day of April, 1916, at the city of Thief River Falls, in Pennington county, unlawfully, wrongfully and wilfully sell intoxicating liquor, to-wit: One pint of whiskey to one J. F. Delaney, without having *44a license therefor, etc. Appellant insists that he should be granted a new trial, and as grounds therefor urges 20 or more specific assignments of error, all of which will be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. SederstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- State v. TeahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
- State v. BadenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Wakeman v. ChambersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. TennysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State v. TremontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- City of St. Paul v. GreeneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.