Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Secretary of the Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 17, 1926PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel thé respondent to omit from the ballot for the next State election a proposed law which he intends to print on the ballot under the initiative procedure provided by art. 48 of the Amendments to the Constitution.

1. The petitioners as citizens and voters have standing to maintain this petition. That is settled by Brewster v. Sherman, 195 Mass. 222, where Chief Justice Knowlton, after saying that the proposition, that in order to maintain a petition for a writ of mandamus one should have a private right or interest in the matter beyond the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Wabash Railroad v. Adelbert College of Western Reserve UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Douglass v. HowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1840

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Sears v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Massachusetts Teachers Ass'n v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Horton v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. School Committee of the City of Lowell v. Mayor of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Moore v. Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API