Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Cone

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 20, 2017No. A157670Published

1Dissent

DUNCAN, J. pro tempore, dissenting.

For more than 30 years, it has been clear that, under Oregon law, "a witness, expert or otherwise, may not give an opinion on whether he believes a witness is telling the truth." State v. Middleton , 294 Or. 427, 438, 657 P.2d 1215 (1983). Applying that rule, we have held, for example, that a trial court erred by admitting testimony by a complainant's mother that she "never doubted [the complainant] for a second." State v. Vargas-Samado , 223 Or.App. 15, 17, 195 P.3d 464 (2008).

Not only does Oregon law prohibit a witness from commenting on the credibility of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. LovernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. MirandaOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. LowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API