State v. Lowell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*365ORTEGA, P. J.
Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of third-degree rape. ORS 163.355.1 He appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in permitting the investigating detective to comment on the credibility of defendant and the complainant. We agree with defendant that the trial court plainly erred and that it is appropriate to exercise our discretion to correct the error.2 Accordingly, we reverse and remand.
The case arises out of allegations that defendant, who was 23 at the time of the alleged incident, engaged in consensual sexual intercourse with the complainant, who was 14 years…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MilbradtOregon Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. CorkillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Davis v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.