Legal Opinion

Dressel v. Ameribank

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 2001No. Docket 222447PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the trial court’s June 12, 1999, opinion that granted defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). We reverse and remand.

On November 7, 1997, plaintiffs obtained from defendant a real estate loan that was secured by a mortgage on their home. In connection with the loan, defendant prepared an adjustable rate note and a mortgage for plaintiffs. The settlement statement designated a $400 fee for “document preparation.” According to the documentation defendant provided plaintiffs, the document preparation fee was described as “a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. . AlfaniNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. State ex rel. Wright v. BarlowNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State Bar v. CramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Derbabian v. S & C Snowplowing, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Grant v. Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2002
  4. Derbabian v. S & C Snowplowing, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API