Legal Opinion
A&C Trade Consultants, Inc. v. Alvarez
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 12, 2021No. 3:18-cv-05356-MMCUnknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 A&C TRADE CONSULTANTS, INC., Case No. 18-cv-05356-MMC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 11 v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED MOTION TO ENTER 12 JOEL E. ALVAREZ, et al., DEFAULT JUDGMENT 13 Defendants. Re: Doc. No. 74 14 15 Before the Court is plaintiff A&C Trade Consultants, Inc.’s (“A&C”) Amended 16 Motion to Enter Default Judgment, brought pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules 17 of Civil Procedure, and filed April 28, 2021.1 Having read and considered the papers filed 18 in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Susan Cripps, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Life Insurance Company of North America, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.