Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment of Essie W. Williams

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1946No. 34,026PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition and accusations filed by the Committee on Practice of Law of the Minnesota State Bar Association against respondent, Essie W. Williams, asking for her disbarment or discipline as an attorney at law, were referred to the Honorable Karl Finkelnburg, a judge of the third judicial district, pursuant to Minn. St. 1941, § 546.36 (Mason St. 1927, § 9319), to hear the evidence and make findings of fact. After a careful consideration of the evidence adduced before the referee, we find his findings of fact, which are adopted by this court, to be clearly sustained by the evidence.

Respondent,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Removal of CarySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Application of Smith for Reinstatement as AttorneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Williams v. JayneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Gamble-Robinson Commission Co. v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. State Board of Examiners in Law v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. In Re Discipline of BunkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Against N.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Clark v. Mississippi State Bar Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API