Legal Opinion

Halcomb v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 7, 2007No. Civil Action 02-1336 (PLF)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ motions in limine to limit the testimony of each others’ expert witnesses. 1 For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant plaintiffs motion and grant in part and deny in part defendant’s motion.

I. BACKGROUND

This case arises out of the arrest and detention of plaintiff Gloria Halcomb in the District of Columbia Metrorail system in October 2001. Plaintiff entered the Me-trorail system on October 30, 2001 at the Union Station entrance. Defendant Nopa-don Woods, a Washington Metropolitan Area…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Butera v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  3. Eduardo Burkhart v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. Minebea Co. v. PapstDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  5. Richman v. SheahanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sherrod v. McHughCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Sommerfield v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  3. Powell v. ToshDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
  4. Rothe Development, Inc. v. Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. Elk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API