Legal Opinion
State v. Bohe
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 25, 2018No. 20170456PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tufte, Justice.
[¶ 1] Daniel Bohe appealed from a criminal judgment entered after his conditional plea of guilty to a charge of driving with a blood alcohol concentration of .08 or greater in violation of N.D.C.C. § 39-08-01. Bohe argues that because he was given an incomplete implied consent advisory, the district court erred by failing to suppress evidence of blood test results under N.D.C.C. § 39-20-01(3)(b). We reverse the judgment and the district court's order denying Bohe's motion to suppress the blood test evidence.
I
[¶ 2] On December 3, 2016, the North Dakota National Guard set up a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Lowe v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BirchfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. O'ConnorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Bismarck v. VagtsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Korb v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. CasatelliNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- City of Fargo v. HoferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- LeClair v. SorelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.