State v. Wicklund
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by the state pursuant to Minn. St. 632.11, subd. 1(3), from the district court’s order suppressing certain evidence necessary to continue prosecution of defendant for possession of a small amount of marijuana in violation of Minn. St. 152.09, subd. (2). The issue is whether the arresting officers violated defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights in searching him and seizing this evidence. Because the district court had not made any findings of fact, we were unable to decide this issue and we therefore remanded the case for findings. 1 After considering these findings, we conclude…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. FishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. BinnsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. EllansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- State v. GannawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State v. ShevchukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of St. Paul v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. OrtegaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. PerryNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Dunn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.