Legal Opinion
State v. Pierce
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 1, 1984No. C1-83-1415PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Appellant seeks review of constitutional search, seizure and confession issues decided at an omnibus hearing. The evidence was ruled admissible, and the case was tried on stipulated facts without a jury, resulting m convictions of carrying a pistol without a permit, theft and criminal damage to property. Appellant contends that his car was searched without probable cause and that his confession should have been suppressed because he was incarcerated too long before being brought before a magistrate. We affirm the convictions.
ISSUES
1. Was the confession the product of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. WibergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- City of St. Paul v. MylesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. WicklundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Skjefte v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Gomez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- State v. WiggintonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. LozarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.