Legal Opinion

State v. Shevchuk

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 5, 1971No. 41867PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Defendant, Paul W. Shevchuk, upon this appeal from a conviction of burglary, contends only that the evidence against him was constitutionally inadmissible as the fruit of an unlawful search and seizure incident to his detention for a traffic offense. We think not, so the judgment of conviction must be affirmed.

A police officer, David John Ericson, observed defendant’s automobile speeding in the city of Bloomington in the early morning hours of March 18, 1968. The automobile did not stop promptly when signaled, but when it did stop, both defendant, who was in the passenger…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. CliffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Willie Robinson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. CavanaughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. State v. HovenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. State v. EllansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. State v. BuchwaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API