Legal Opinion
State v. Ortega
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 30, 2009No. A07-22PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Appellant Danny Ortega was charged with one count of fifth-degree cocaine possession under Minn.Stat. § 152.025, subd. 2(1) (2008). Before trial, Ortega moved to suppress all evidence of his narcotics possession, contending that the evidence was the product of an illegal search and seizure. After a contested omnibus hearing, the district court denied Ortega’s motion. Using the procedure approved in State v. Lothenbach, 296 N.W.2d 854 (Minn.1980), 1 Ortega stipulated to the evidence against him. The district court found him guilty. The court of appeals affirmed his…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CruzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- State v. DiedeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. MiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Pacheco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.