State, ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The main issue raised by this cause is whether a writ of mandamus should issue to compel the Industrial Commission to “vacate its order” requiring relator to pay Christy a 24% percent permanent partial disability award.. Relator raises three challenges to the Court of Appeal's ’ denial of its complaint for a writ of mandamus. The first is that the commission abused its discretion when it awarded 24% percent disability benefits to Christy because there is insufficient evidence to support a finding that the July 1968 injury caused that degree of disability. The second is that the commission…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Geauga Industries, Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979