Legal Opinion

State, ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1977No. 76-1285PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The main issue raised by this cause is whether a writ of mandamus should issue to compel the Industrial Commission to “vacate its order” requiring relator to pay Christy a 24% percent permanent partial disability award.. Relator raises three challenges to the Court of Appeal's ’ denial of its complaint for a writ of mandamus. The first is that the commission abused its discretion when it awarded 24% percent disability benefits to Christy because there is insufficient evidence to support a finding that the July 1968 injury caused that degree of disability. The second is that the commission…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Geauga Industries, Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API