Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Geauga Industries, Co. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1979No. 78-675PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Industrial Commission has broad discretion in the performance of its duties and its actions are presumed to be in all respects valid and in the exercise of good faith and sound judgment. State, ex rel. Gerspacher, v. Coffinberry (1952), 157 Ohio St. 32. As long as there is some evidence to support the commission’s findings and no abuse of discretion is shown, the commission’s order will not be disturbed. State, ex rel. General Motors Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 155.

Relator objects to the determination made by the commission that relator violated IC-5-08.03 (A). That…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. M. T. D. Products, Inc. v. StebbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Springfield Container Corp. v. StebbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State, ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Aspinwall v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. King v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Jaramillo v. Anaconda Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API