Sarlls v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shiras
delivered .the opinion of the court.
At the May term, 1892, in the District Court of the- United States for the "Western District of Arkansas, the plaintiff in error was indicted and convicted of introducing, at the Choctaw Nation, in the Indian country, ten gallons of lager beer, which the indictment averred were “ spirituous liquors,” and the introduction of which into the Indian country was made an offence, punishable by fine and imprisonment, by section 2139, Revised Statutes of the United States.
That section is in the following terms:
“ No ardent spirits shall be introduced under any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- State v. . GierschSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Hollender v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. WeitzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Johnson v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Spencer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.