Legal Opinion
Capital Telephone Co. v. New York Telephone Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 18, 1984No. 7, Docket 84-7176PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Foley, J., granting defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissing plaintiffs’ claims. Because we conclude that defendant’s actions are protected from antitrust liability by state action immunity according to the standards set forth by the Supreme Court in California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass’n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97, 100 S.Ct. 937, 63 L.Ed.2d 233 (1980), we affirm.
Background
A. Facts
The plaintiffs are a number of Radio…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. IMR Capital Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- New England Motor Rate Bureau, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. North American Industries of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Health Care Equalization Committee of the Iowa Chiropractic Society v. Iowa Medical SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Capital Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.