Legal Opinion

Luti v. Graco, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1985No. G000498PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSBY, J.

We find an inference of prejudice sufficient to support the superior court’s dismissal of this products liability action, which went unserved for almost three years, under the two-year discretionary statute (former Code Civ. Proc., § 583, subd. (a)).

I

On April 24, 1979, John Luti suffered a severe hand injury from an airless paint spray gun. Within six weeks he retained a lawyer who filed a workers’ compensation claim.

In the fall of 1979, his attorney obtained a copy of a report prepared by the employer’s carrier which blamed a failed “whip line” for injecting paint into…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Sanborn v. Chronicle Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Wilson v. Sunshine Meat & Liquor Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hurtado v. Statewide Home Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Espindola v. NunezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Danielson v. ITT Industrial Credit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Freedman v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Longshore v. PineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Schumpert v. Tishman Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API