State v. Marquis
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnson, J.:
Shane M. Marquis appeals the district court’s determination that he violated the conditions of his probation and the corresponding decision to revoke that probation. Marquis contends that the district court violated his right of confrontation under both the federal and state Constitutions by considering the affidavit of his supervising officer without complying with, the requirements for the admission of testimonial hearsay set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S. Ct. 1354, 158 L. Ed. 2d 177 (2004). We find that the Sixth…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Mary A. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- Robert Smith v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. EsquilinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. BeloneSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.