Legal Opinion

State v. Esquilin

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 30, 2018No. AC38762PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.

The defendant, Kason U. Esquilin, appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32 and imposing a four year prison sentence. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court deprived him of his right to due process by admitting into evidence reports of the results of drug tests performed on urine samples collected from the defendant, without requiring the state to introduce such results through the testimony of the analysts who performed the actual testing. We conclude, in accordance with State v. Polanco , 165 Conn. App. 563 , 571, 140…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. FearsOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State v. BrandonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  3. Riccio v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  4. State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Maxx Austin Burrows v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API