Legal Opinion
Faringer v. Van De Hoef
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 16, 1920Published
Appeal from Sioux District Court. — C. C. Bradley, Judge. Action to restrain defendant from entering on certain land or interfering with plaintiff’s possession thereof, and to have the injunction made perpetual, and for other relief. On hearing, the petition was dismissed, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
I. The plaintiff, being the owner of two quarter sections of land, sold one of them to defendant and his father-in-law, Bleinberg, and, on April 3, 1919, leased the other to defendant for a term of two years, beginning March 1, 1920, at the annual rental of $12 per acre. The lease contained, among other provisions, the following:
“First. All manure on the farm up to March 1, 1920, *324must remain and be bauled on this farm before November 1, 1919. * * *
“Second. If the second party shall fail to cultivate said premises as herein agreed, or shall fail to keep any of the covenants contained in this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maginnis v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Little Rock Granite Co. v. ShallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Blank v. Independent Ice Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Johnson v. Electric Park Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911