Waldron v. Murphy
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Hillsdale. Foreclosures. Defendant Ashbaugb appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
Two causes between the same parties and depending on the same state of facts have been argued together and the same decision will cover them both.
Both bills are filed to foreclose mortgages on the same property, made by defendants Permelia and Luana Mur-' phy (in which one Eeuben A. Murphy joined). One was dated December 22, 1869, for $700, payable to David Emery in three years with annual interest at 10 per cent. The other was dated April 7, 1870, given to Benjamin IV Murphy for $1,400, payable in two years with interest at 10 per cent. The first through intermediate assignment became the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Caruthers v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
- Eslow v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Potts v. PlaistedMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Flanders v. ChamberlainMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Van Husan v. KanouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Easton v. LittooyWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Union Mut. Life Ins. v. Union Mills Plaster Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1889
- Hess v. HaasMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Hayward v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Post v. SpringstedMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.