Legal Opinion
State v. Weisberg
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 13, 1991No. C5-91-135PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
This appeal challenges the revocation of probation for violation of a condition imposed after conviction for a sports bookmaking offense. We affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion to vacate the original conviction but reverse the order revoking probation.
FACTS
In 1989 Max Weisberg pleaded guilty to sports bookmaking, a violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.75. The court imposed a 15-month sentence but stayed execution of the sentence on condition that Weisberg not commit the same or similar violations and that he perform 100 hours of community service.
In May 1990 Weisberg…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- United States v. Joseph CammisanoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Wensman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Max Weisberg v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- State v. StalochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Max Weisberg v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Max Weisberg v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.