Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph Cammisano

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 1, 1979No. 79-1002PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Circuit Judge.

Joseph Cammisano and his brother, William Cammisano (Willie) were charged by indictment with extortion in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. Although refusing to admit their guilt the two brothers entered guilty pleas in exchange for sentencing recommendations by the Government. Approximately two weeks after the pleas were entered Joseph Cammi-sano through his attorney moved to withdraw his plea. Following an evidentiary hearing the motion was denied and sentence was rendered according to the terms of the plea agreement. On appeal defendant asserts that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony J. SmalleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  2. William J. Politte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. James H. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Max Weisberg v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. State v. FrederickWashington Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API