State v. Staloch
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge. *
In challenging a district court order revoking probation, appellant argues that the orally pronounced sentence, which suspended much of his imposed jail term and did not mention probation or conditions of probation, did not actually place him on probation and, therefore, he could not be found in violation of probation. Because we conclude that the terms of appellant’s oral sentence take precedence over contrary terms in his written sentence, we reverse.
FACTS
Appellant Robert L. Staloch was arrested for, and shortly thereafter pleaded guilty to, gross misdemeanor driving…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Paul C. "Paulie" VillanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. David T. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. WeisbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pageau v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Robert Bryant Salley, Jr. v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Bret Emery VansickelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Dylan Ronald PlesselCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014