Legal Opinion
State v. Serstock
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 20, 1987No. C3-86-264PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Respondent Emanuel A. Serstock was indicted by a grand jury on three counts of violating the public officer misconduct statute, Minn.Stat. § 609.43(2) (1984). In a pretrial order, the trial court dismissed the indictment on the grounds that the facts alleged did not constitute an offense and that the language of the indictment was not sufficiently specific to satisfy Minn.R. Crim.P. 17.02, subd. 2, and Minn.Stat. § 628.18 (1986). The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court decision with respect to Counts I and II, holding that those counts failed to state an offense.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Thomas M. HaasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. OmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. BiasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. PetroneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Max Weisberg v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- State v. KendellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. ZacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.