United States v. Alvis Patrick Daras, United States of America v. James Scott Kidd
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
These are separate appeals from convictions under a one-count indictment charging both defendants with violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (1) (possession of cocaine with intent to distribute). The defendants were tried without a jury on a stipulated set of facts. They raise identical issues on appeal which their separate counsel argue in briefs which have an almost word for word similarity. We affirm.
The first contention is that the indictment should have been dismissed because percipient witnesses were not called before the grand jury, but reliance was upon hearsay evidence; also, that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jerome Byrnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Arthur Dale Jack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Adolpho RodriquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. William N. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. John Robert Heck, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Eldon Guy Trenary, United States of America v. John Clyde AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. HearstDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1975
- Wiggins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.